WWE Offseason: 8 Reasons They Need One And 7 To Keep It Year Round

Every major North American sport is granted an offseason for its players. Many times an offseason is used as a time to recharge, and prepare mentally for the upcoming season. Though professional wrestlers are not considered “real” athletes by most sports fans, the men and women who participate in the art of wrestling train and compete like most athletes.

In truth the only difference between a wrestler and an NFL player, is that NFL players have a union to fall back on. The NFL Players Association is responsible for protecting the interests of their players; the WWE doesn’t have a union. This means that despite the physical nature of their profession, wrestlers never have a chance to take a break.

If the WWE formed a union tomorrow, one of the first things that the group would do is institute an offseason. For years this topic has been debated by fans, with both sides bringing up strong arguments for and against an offseason for the WWE. Today we will be dissecting these arguments, and taking a fair look at the pros and the cons of an offseason for wrestlers.

As always feel free to let us know your thoughts and opinions in the comments below.

15 8. For: Keeping The Roster Healthy


Let’s face it, the WWE roster became more depleted in the past year, than ever before. We saw stars like Seth Rollins, John Cena, Cesaro, Sasha Banks, Bray Wyatt, Randy Orton, Neville, Luke Harper and Enzo all go down with significant injuries. The human body isn’t meant to be pushed so hard for such long periods of time, without any opportunity to recover; unfortunately this is the WWE way. If WWE would actually give their Superstars a period to recover from the severe physical toll that comes with falling down for a living, they could reduce injuries and potentially stretch careers.

14 7. Against: Loss Of Money


Well this is the obvious one, and probably the reason that an offseason will never happen. There is no chance in hell (pun intended) that Vince McMahon is going to sacrifice over three months worth of ad revenue to have an offseason. According to the WWE’s website, the television portion of their brand accounted for just over $100 million of their total revenue. Assuming that their total revenue was distributed equally throughout the year, would mean that an offseason would cost the WWE about $25 million per year in television gains alone.

13 7. For: Time To Develop


If we have learned anything from WWE, it’s that forcing a wrestler down our throats will not create Superstars. On the contrary the act of over pushing a newbie in the world of wrestling often breeds contempt for the young star. Roman Reigns is the case and point for this example, as he was pushed into two separate WrestleMania main events, despite only being in the wrestling business for less than five years. To put that in perspective, Shawn Michaels, who is generally considered “Mr. Wrestlemania”, didn’t headline the event until he was a 12 year veteran of the business.

12 6. Against: Loss Of Interest


We can assume that the WWE may be able to get their creative juices flowing during an offseason, but what will that matter if no one is around to watch? The time suggested for the offseason would run parallel with a student’s summer vacation. This is important because as of today, students are WWE’s primary demographic. With the short attention span of kids today, it’s hard to predict whether or not they would stay interested in a show that has offseasons.

11 6. For: Anticipation


The current highest rated show on cable television is The Walking Dead, and the reason for that is anticipation. Not only the anticipation that comes from waiting for a new episode, but the feeling that you get when you know it’s coming back after a long break. WWE could capitalize on this same process, by shutting down production for three months and using their talented audio visual staff to create teasers during the break. They could put these teasers up on their social media, primarily on YouTube to bridge the gap between “seasons”.

10 5. Against: Goes Against Tradition


Wrestlers are a special combination of athletes, actors, and rock stars, with many of them being very content living a very fast lifestyle. Though some would probably jump at the chance to have an offseason, wrestlers have a long standing tradition of embracing endurance in the industry. Veterans of the wrestling business have never been shy about giving their opinions on how things have changed, usually by spewing scathing critiques of the current product. Could you imagine hearing the Iron Sheik talk about an offseason in the WWE? It would be madness personified.

9 5. For: Big Returns


Some of the entries in this list work in conjunction with one another, which is the case with this one and some of the other arguments for an offseason. Having a surprise return at either the end of the season, or beginning of the season could give a huge boost to all facets of the product. Imagine if CM Punk came back unannounced at the end of a WrestleMania, or even had a surprise match during the SummerSlam season opener. It would do huge things for the interest of the product.

8 4. Against: Creates Momentum Problems


There is a two prong momentum problem that would come along with breaking up the year for wrestlers. The first part of the problem would involve cutting off a wrestler who is just getting with the crowd in the middle of their run. In the case of someone like Daniel Bryan, who had an incredible organic push from the crowd, the season finale would have stunted his main event status. WWE management could potentially hurt the long term status of some of their rising stars because of this situation.

7 4. For: Overall Quality/Ratings Increase


WWE has a problem of overdoing a good thing, If you don’t think so take a look at most Chris Jericho storylines; let’s use his recent feud with AJ Styles as an example. The Jericho/Styles matches were great, but there were too many of them on regular programming to make the pay per view matches mean anything. In turn fans are subjected to a wrestling product that substitutes in quantity for overall quality. One of the worst side effects of this lack of quality in WWE programming would have to be their terrible ratings as of the past few years.

6 3. Against: What Happens To The Champions?


So, what does the WWE Champion do during the offseason? It’s a good question, that doesn’t really have a good answer. The title holders for the WWE could be required to make media appearances for the company, but eventually they would need to be compensated for those appearances. Once the WWE is required to compensate some Superstars for making media appearances, they will have to compensate them all for making appearances. Keep in mind that there is going to be a significant drop in revenue for the WWE, meaning that they may not be able to swing that kind of bill.

5 3. For: Generates More Creativity


Though the WWE has a staff of a gazillion writers, it seems that the same storylines are recycled over and over again. Now in truth writing unique storylines on a weekly basis is daunting to say the least, no matter how many writers you have in the bullpen. Unlike in previous generations of wrestling booking, the WWE does not plot out long term plans for their stars, which has been a detriment to both character development and creativity.

With a longer period to develop ideas, writers could potentially create rich interweaving storylines for everybody on the roster. Because there would be a definite end point, WWE stars wouldn’t be forced to participate in ridiculous antics that only hurt their character in the long run.

4 2. Against: Wrestlers Could Get In Trouble


When athletes don’t have anything to do, they get themselves into trouble. Heck, wrestlers have been known to get themselves into hot water without there being an offseason. Chances are most of the guys and girls on the WWE roster would find there way into legal troubles during the summer months of an offseason. We have already witnessed multiple wrestlers being arrested for things like driving under the influence, assault, shoplifting, and possession of drugs/drug paraphernalia.

3 2. For: WWE's Schedule Has A Built In Break


The most common argument against the idea of an offseason involves the idea of when could the WWE afford to do it. Looking at this from an entertainment standpoint, the most logical answer would be to end with your biggest show of the year; WrestleMania. So if WWE would close out the year with the biggest show, it would only make sense to start the new season with the second biggest; SummerSlam. By utilizing two already established pay per views as their starting and end point, WWE wouldn’t have to establish any credibility for either show, as their legacies would be enough.

2 1. Against: Wrestlers Could Return Out Of Shape


We’ve seen it time and time again in the world of wrestling, and there is nothing sadder, than seeing your favorite wrestler out of shape. Sure sometimes age can catch up with a wrestler causing them to pack on a few pounds, but sitting at home with nothing to do doesn’t help either. This especially rings true for guys who are already borderline out of shape, Kevin Owens comes to mind. If WWE would allow the wrestlers work for other promotions during the offseason, this wouldn't be a problem. Chances are though that Vince McMahon wouldn’t let any of his talents risk their health by performing at an indie show.

1 1. For: Wrestlers Could Explore Other Avenues


If 95% of your life was spent working/traveling, you could quickly see how some wrestlers get completely burned out in just a few years. With only 5% of your time left for yourself, it’d be hard to explore personal interests outside of wrestling. In fact, the WWE practically discourages wrestlers striking out on their own, with reports surfacing that Dolph Ziggler’s comedy career is what stops him from being pushed in WWE. Whether or not that is true is up for debate, but what isn’t is the potential media exposure that wrestlers could generate during their off time.

The current WWE roster easily has over 100 active on-screen members, which means that the WWE could have 100 brand ambassadors working for them during their off time. This would be the time that wrestlers would host kid shows, work game shows, participate in podcasts, and move forward in any other facet of entertainment that they saw fit. It would essentially give them a choice, which is a huge mental boost that staves off burn out.

Give TheSportster a Thumbs up!

Looking for an AD FREE EXPERIENCE on TheSportster?

Get Your Free Access Now!

More in Wrestling

WWE Offseason: 8 Reasons They Need One And 7 To Keep It Year Round